For India it was precisely the start they wanted; for Kenya there was little disgrace in defeat by eight wickets.Between them, the Kenyan Cricket Association and the ICC put up a good show in most respects. The Nairobi Gymkhana Ground looked a picture with a good and enthusiastic crown scattered around a collection of new stands. The pitch played well, the players entertained and the weather behaved itself.But for the sizeable media contingent who turned up for the opening match of the ICC KnockOut 2000, the facilities were far from ideal. Kenya hope to stage their games during the 2003 World Cup at home. If the present state of affairs persists, this dream cannot even be countenanced.Still, the rest of it was good value. Kenya didn’t really give themselves a chance by making only 208 for nine in their 50 overs, the major share of which came by way of an 81-run stand for the fourth wicket between Ravindu Shah and skipper Maurice Odumbe.Shah, compact and composed, looked a fine player during his 60 while Odumbe also bagged a half-century with 51 off 87 balls. But apart from Thomas Odoyo’s unbeaten 35, there was little support. Kenya desperately needed a substantial contribution from their best batsman, Steve Tikolo, but he made just 5. The three Indian seamers, Zaheer Khan, Ajit Agarkar and Venkatesh Prasad shared seven of the wickets with Anil Kumble taking two for 22 in his 10.India started cautiously, and Kenya had their best moment of the day when Sachin Tendulkar was adjudged leg before for 35 by Dave Orchard. But the home side had to bowl their most likely wicket-taker, Martin Suji, out – his 10 overs costing just 30 – and Saurav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid seldom looked like getting themselves out.They added 88 for the second wicket before Ganguly rushed down the wicket to Odumbe only to be beaten by the turn and stumped, but Vinod Kambli, so often a wayward genius, came in and set about getting things over with quickly.Kamblie crashed seven boundaries in his 32-ball 39 and if Dravid was more leisurely in making his 68 not out, he was no less able to find the gaps as India picked up the pace.In the end the Indians got home with six-and-a-half overs to spare in what was a useful, if not unduly taxing, day at the office. Australia will no doubt provide a somewhat sterner test when the two teams meet in the first of the quarter-finals on Saturday.By then the ICC and the KCA might have found a way to make reporting on the match something less of a test for man and machine.
Harbhajan Singh faces a minimum ten-match ban from the Indian Premier League if an official hearing, in New Delhi on Monday afternoon, finds him guilty of having hit Sreesanth, his India team-mate.Harbhajan also faces separate action from the BCCI, which has asked him to explain, “as a contracted player”, his role in the incident after the IPL match between the offspinner’s Mumbai Indians and Sreesanth’s King XI Punjab on Friday. Niranjan Shah, the BCCI secretary, said on Monday that Sudhir Nanavati, a lawyer, has been appointed to conduct a “preliminary inquiry” and submit a report “within 15 days” to Sharad Pawar, the BCCI president, who will refer the findings to the board’s disciplinary committee for possible action.Sreesanth, meanwhile, faces either an official reprimand or a strong unofficial warning for his “provocative” actions leading up to the incident, which was captured on one of the host broadcaster’s on-field cameras.”I understand the BCCI is looking into the [Harbhajan] matter separately,” IS Bindra, a member of the IPL governing council, told Cricinfo. When asked about the possible penalty involved, Bindra, who is also president of the Punjab Cricket Association which hosted Friday’s match at Mohali, confirmed that Harbhajan faced a minimum ban of 10 IPL games.If the minimum ban is applied by Farokh Engineer, the match referee, it would still seriously affect Harbhajan’s chances of playing any further role in this edition of the IPL. Mumbai Indians, who lost their first four games, have 10 more to play in the home-and-away league format till the semi-finals.However, hectic efforts are on by some officials within the BCCI and IPL, run by the Indian board, to ensure that the “judicial principle of double jeopardy” is applied in this case, and Harbhajan is not “punished for the same offence twice”. This would mean that the offspinner could be punished by the IPL, which is officially a domestic event, but may not face any separate sanctions from the BCCI on playing for India.”Any action from the BCCI’s side could result in a further ban from playing in a specified number of Tests and ODIs. But that would run contrary to the basic judicial principle of double jeopardy. Normally, any person shouldn’t be punished for the same offence twice,” a senior official told Cricinfo.But another section within the Indian establishment, which has had its eye on Harbhajan ever since allegations of indiscipline were reported against him by the team management during the Greg Chappell era, is keen to see that “strong action” is taken to send out a “serious message” in the “larger interests of the game”.Officials from this hardline group were also not entirely convinced of Harbhajan’s version of events during the subsequent race row last year involving Andrew Symonds in Australia. “Once Sachin Tendulkar backed Harbhajan’s version of the race crisis in Australia, the BCCI had no option but to support him all the way,” said another BCCI official, who said he was strongly pushing for a strict penalty.However, officials on both sides of the Harbhajan debate agree it is time Sreesanth, the temperamental fast bowler who has crossed the line of accepted on-field behaviour often in his two-year career, is pulled up as well, either in the form of an official reprimand or a private warning. “The fresh video evidence might prove Harbhajan is guilty, but nobody should ignore Sreesanth’s history of on-field problems and provocative actions leading up to the incident,” an IPL official, who was present in Mohali, said on Friday.Interestingly, Harbhajan and Sreesanth told reporters on Saturday they had “sorted out the issue” and were now like “brothers of one family”. But Engineer, the adjudicator on Monday, said: “We are not going to sweep things under the carpet.”
Karen Rolton led from the front with an unbeaten 81, but Australia had to repel a fine New Zealand recovery to snatch the Rose Bowl with a two-run victory in Darwin. Australia’s defence of 198 was going well when the visitors were dropped to 6 for 81 by Sarah Andrews and Emma Samson before Nicola Browne intervened.With help from Rachel Priest (33), Brown edged towards the target and by the time she departed for 61 off 76 deliveries they needed 28 from 4.1 overs with two wickets remaining. Helen Watson chipped in with 16 from 19, Sophie Devine scampered to 11 and the No. 11 Sarah Burke reached six, but only a single to midwicket was managed from the last ball when three were needed.Andrews, who delivered the final over, finished with 2 for 34 from ten while the debutant Rene Farrell impressed with 3 for 36 at a tense situation. Australia’s total was set up by the experienced Rolton, who stayed for 115 balls and hit eight fours and a six. She received support from Melissa Bulow’s 41 while Sarah Tsukigawa provided some middle-order damage with 4 for 43.”It’s great to win the series, especially since we’ve had new players come in and with the injuries we’ve had here,” Rolton said. “It’s been good to play against a great team and have these close matches to increase the experience of the players.” The 3-1 result means Sunday’s final fixture will be a dead rubber.Rolton’s knock also made her the second-most prolific batsman in the history of women’s cricket. Rolton, who won the Women’s Player of the Year award at the ICC Awards in Mumbai last November, eclipsed New Zealander Debbie Hockley’s ODI aggregate of 4,064 runs while scoring her unbeaten 81.
The most significant obstacle to Pakistan’s continued domination of the final Test was the weather, with just 60 overs possible on the second day at The Oval, but the elements were about all that was going to stop Mohammad Yousuf’s remorseless accumulation. His third century of a record-breaking series built on the Pakistan bowler’s impressive showing and, coupled with attractive 90s from Imran Farhat and Mohammad Hafeez, set up a position from which there should be only one winner.While Pakistan’s cricket throughout the series has given plenty of material for those who talk about their mercurial nature, Yousuf has consistently gorged himself on the England attack. His latest century seemed almost inevitable and was as elegant and confident as the 202 at Lord’s and 192 at Headingley. And, unless the rest of the side suffer a collective implosion that would do even Pakistan proud – or the weather closes in for three days – this one will be in victory.Yousuf reached his century off 174 balls when he took Paul Collingwood for three fours in an over, having already set a new record for a Pakistan batsman in a series against England. It confirmed his standing as the in-form player of world cricket and the only semblance of a problem he encountered was against Monty Panesar, but even that wasn’t as pronounced as earlier matches.However, Yousuf’s credentials were known before this series, although he has clearly performed at the top of his game, so the aspect that will have pleased Bob Woolmer about Pakistan’s batting is the identity of the two men who provided supporting roles. Usually it has been a combination of Yousuf with either Inzamam-ul-Haq or Younis Khan, but here it was two different faces.Imran Farhat started Pakistan’s day in fine style, peppering the cover boundary with a series of rasping drives as the England bowlers again strayed too wide. The swing of the first day wasn’t evident and Farhat had the confidence to hit through the line. His aggressive intent was confirmed when he charged down the track to Panesar’s first ball and launched him many rows back over long on.He was within nine of his third Test century when he pushed out at Matthew Hoggard and Marcus Trescothick held on a first slip – but how England would have been wishing his hands had been as safe when Yousuf edged one the previous evening.Hafeez, who had been forced to retire hurt early in the innings with a knee tendon problem, resumed his innings and, although he couldn’t sprint between the wickets, was quickly into his stride with three fours in a row off Hoggard. Whenever England were threatening to create some pressure – and those moments were few and far between – the bowlers would lose their line and Pakistan cashed in.
Hafeez reached his second Test fifty in grand style, lofting Panesar effortlessly over mid off for six, and was equally impressive against the pacemen. He was called up to the Pakistan squad primarily as a one-day specialist, but has been far more impressive in the Test arena than either Salman Butt or Taufeeq Umar.The main alarms Yousuf and Hafeez had in bringing up their century stand was with the running and they kept flirting with danger, although England’s throws from the infield were as wayward as their bowling. Harmison bowled shorter and wider the more overs he sent down – cumulating in an embarrassing delivery with the second new ball that speared down the leg-side for five wides. For once, Panesar didn’t offer Andrew Strauss the control he wanted and that must be credited to the aggressive intent of the batsmen. He did, though, have a couple of close shouts for lbw denied.The third-wicket stand had reached 177 – after Hafeez survived a chance to Panesar at long-leg on 79 – and Strauss and gone through all his options to try and speed towards the second new ball. However, it was Hoggard – the man to suffer all England’s dropped chances – who made the breakthrough as he loosened up with the older ball. Hafeez chipped a catch to midwicket five short of a ton that would have completed a fine return to the Test side.That was almost the final action of the day as poor light drove the players off the field for the second time, but such has been Yousuf’s form that he could have scored runs in the dark. England have been handed brief respite, but will need plenty more help from the weather to save this match, against a Pakistan side that has dazzled for two days.
How they were out
Click here to read Cricinfo’s description of each wicket
Kenneth Gordon, the former media manager from Trinidad and Tobago, has been elected, as expected, as the president of the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) at the sixth annual meeting held in St Maarten on Sunday. Gordon, who was the sole nominee for the post, replaces Teddy Griffith who had indicated last June that he would not accept nomination. Valentine Banks was elected the vice-president after defeating Clive Lloyd, the former West Indies captain.Gordon, 75, was in a one-horse race as two of his opponents, the former WICB president Pat Rousseau of Jamaica and the former WICB director Tony Marshall of Barbados, withdrew their nominations last month. He will now be at the helm of the regional association for at least the next two years and will oversee the West Indies’ staging of the 2007 ICC Cricket World Cup, the first time the event will be hosted in this region.Gordon has had a long, distinguished career and a rather hefty resume: he has served as the chairman of Neal and Massy Holdings, a major Caribbean conglomerate, and was managing director of the and chief executive officer and chairman of Caribbean Communications Network (CCN). He was also instrumental in the establishment of a number of regional media houses in Guyana, Jamaica and Barbados. Apart from that, Gordon was also as a senator in parliament and a government minister in Trinidad and Tobago.Banks, 55, is presently serving as vice-president of the WICB. A banker by profession, Banks, who is from Anguilla, was previously the president of the Leeward Islands Cricket Association.
Shane Warne is confident of playing some part in the two-Test series against Sri Lanka, after earlier fears that a broken left hand would force him out of the entire Top End tour. The Australian reported that Warne was positive about his recovery, and felt that his chances of playing were better than 50-50 because he was “a very good healer”.”I would say my chances of playing in the first Test are now more than 50-50,” said Warne. “When the match begins, it would have been 20 days since I broke it so I am optimistic. The second Test in Cairns is a week or two after that, so I have to be very confident of playing in that. All I can do to aid the healing process is not bang it again, but I am happy with the way it’s going. If it continues to heal as quickly as it has done, I should be okay for Darwin. Normally I am a very good healer. I have never broken a finger before but I got over my shoulder and my knee injuries, so there is no reason why I can’t get over this.”Warne damaged his hand in a first-class game for Hampshire against Essex, and when x-rays confirmed a broken bone, it appeared that the showdown between him and Muttiah Muralitharan would not take place. But in a matter of a few days, there have been twists in that tale, with Warne likely to play at least one Test, and Murali opting out of the tour. If Warne does play, both Courtney Walsh’s tally of 519 wickets, and Murali’s record-breaking figure – 527 – will come under threat. But with his participation still in doubt, Warne wasn’t looking that far ahead.”I don’t want to say anything about Murali and if I get past Walsh, so be it,” he said. “My only aim is to get fit. I’m not worried about records. My job as a bowler is to take as many wickets as I can for Australia, whoever the opposition is.”
It all seemed to going to plan for Marvan Atapattu, Sri Lanka’s new captain.During the morning Sri Lanka’s bowling and fielding was zippy andpurposeful. Despite the early loss of Sanath Jayasuriya, the home side werestrolling on 62 for one. But Pakistan came storming back into the match inthe last quarter to complete a crushing 79 run win in the opening match ofthe Bank Alfalah Cup at the Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium.Sri Lanka started disastrously – Shoaib Akhtar celebrated his recall to theside by removing Jayasuriya for a first-ball duck – but only lost their wayafter an Abdul Razzaq inswinger thudded into the pads of Atapattu, who hadgrafted hard for his 26 from 67 balls. The leg-before decision ended a 61run stand for the second wicket and was the catalyst for Sri Lanka’spathetic freefall.Akhtar was pulled back into the attack and the speedster quickly accountedfor Sangakkara, who had been dropped on 2 and 17. Sangakkara skewed aback-foot drive to Shoaib Malik at point (75 for 3). The recalled MahelaJayawardene and Russel Arnold, who has had little match practice since beingdumped after the World Cup, rallied briefly, adding 33 in 37 balls.But then came the quick demise. Mohammad Sami planted a 90 mph inswingingyorker on Jayawardene’s toe, winning a dubious leg-before shout, and RomeshKaluwitharana, another returnee, chipped a catch tamely to mid-wicket offShoain Malik (99 for 5).Sri Lanka started to panic. Kaushal Lokuarachchi and Chaminda Vaas were runout and Russel Arnold, who had crawled to 13 from 49 balls, skied a catch ashe top edged a sweep. Malik and Sami then mopped up the tail – Sri Lanka hadlost seven wickets for 22.Atapattu’s first day in charge had begun well. His fast bowlers exploitedheavy overhead conditions, moving the ball in the air and off the pitch, toseize the initiative. His spinners nipped away at the middle order and thefielders clung onto to every chance that came their way.Mohammad Hafeez anchored the innings, top-scoring for the visitors with apatient 53 from 114 balls – his second one-day fifty in his fifth match -but their best partnerships ended just when they looked like they mightflourish. Hafeez added 48 with Faisal Iqbal (21) and 45 with Younis Khan(29).Both Chaminda Vaas and Prabath Nissanka found assistance from the pitch andfrom the heavy atmosphere. Vaas swung the ball, while Nissanka extractedbounce and seam movement from the brown, grassless pitch. Both beat the batregularly and Atapattu pressed for wickets, setting aggressive fields duringthe first half of the innings.Taufeeq Umar (9) opened his account with a flicked boundary just wide of adiving Kumar Sangakkara at square leg, before edging a catch to RomeshKaluwitharana behind the stumps in the eighth over of the morning (21 for1).Faisal Iqbal, the nephew of coach Javed Miandad, would have been run outwithout scoring had Sanath Jayasuriya at cover-point not missed the stumps.He and Hafeez were quite comfortable against Sri Lanka ‘s allrounders -Kaushal Lokuarachchi and Kaushalya Weereratne – but run-scoring remaineddifficult.Muttiah Muralitharan, whose entry into the attack was delayed thanks to thetight bowling of his colleagues, then broke through in only his second over.Iqbal edged an arm-ball to Mahela Jayawardene at slip, and he clung on to asharp catch to his left (69 for 2).Six balls later, Yousuf Youhana (1), Pakistan’s leading batsmen after thepost-World Cup purge, was also caught by Jayawardene at slip offLokuarachchi. He attempted an extravagant square cut, but only ended upgloving the legbreak straight to Jayawardene (70 for 3).Hafeez and Khan steadied the innings, adding 45 in 75 balls but whenMuralitharan returned for his second spell, they were soon back in trouble.Khan, looking for his first boundary, mistimed a leg-side flick and wascaught in the deep (115 for 5).Shaoib Akhtar was a bizarre choice at number six, as Rashid Latif tried tokickstart the innings with a few boundaries. But the plan failed as Akhtar,overly anxious to grab the strike from his cautious partner, was run out for5 (123 for 5).Sanath Jayasuriya – the most expensive of the three spinners employed -ended Hafeez’s painstaking vigil when he tried to loft a straight drive overKumar Sangakkara at deep mid-on. Sangakkara held on to a fine diving catch(158 for 5).The allrounders came and went. Shaoib Malik breezed to 20 from 14 balls,before being run out and Rashid Latif (14) biffed one four before becomingMuralitharan’s third victim of the innings – Kaluwitharana completing astumping (181 for 8). Abdul Razzaq did have time to smash one six in his unbeaten 24 from 27 balls as 14 runs were stolen from the last over.The performance of the three teams during this tournament will affect theirpositions in the International Cricket Council’s new One-Day InternationalChampionship table. Sri Lanka, currently in fourth position, have a chanceto move into third position ahead of Pakistan, while New Zealand – currentlyequal seventh with England – can move ahead of West Indies into sixthposition in the ratings.
It was a not-so-small step for a man, but a giant leap forward for blackcricket in Zimbabwe. Hamilton Masakadza, already Zimbabwe’s youngest (andfirst black) first-class centurion and youngest Test player, became theyoungest batsman at 17 years and 354 days to score a century on his Testdebut.Saleem Malik was the previous holder of this record, and for Zimbabwe, Masakadza follows in the footsteps of Dave Houghton – who at almost exactly twice Masakadza’s age remains the oldest player to score a century on Test debut!Overall Zimbabwe produced a major surprise for West Indies on the third dayof the Test Match at Harare Sports Club. After doing their best to throwaway the game on the first day, Zimbabwe’s batsmen regrouped so effectivelythat by the close they were 324 for four, 108 runs ahead of West Indies withsix wickets left. They began this morning wondering if they could lastout the day. They will start tomorrow believing they can win.West Indies bowled without inspiration and missed several crucial chances in the field. Zimbabwe’s top order, to their credit, exploited these lapses to the full, but if they do manage to pull off an amazing victory, the West Indianfielders will be primarily to blame.Masakadza, replacing Dion Ebrahim after the latter’s controversial dismissal the previous evening, showed his intentions early by hitting the second ball of the day for a beautifully timed on-driven four. He and Alistair Campbell played the West Indian pacemen quite confidently and competently, but Neil McGarrell, when he came on, found turn, occasionally vicious spin, from the pitch.Without forcing the pace, a confident partnership developed at a rate ofabout four runs an over, with Campbell playing the leading role butMasakadza impressing with his good sense and maturity. The usual large andlively crowd of township children was in attendance, as well as a couple ofhundred adult spectators.Campbell reached his fifty with an effortless flick for four over theleg-side field off McGarrell, and both batsmen, perhaps recognising thethreat he posed, seemed determined to seize every possible scoringopportunity off him. A century partnership was in the offing when, with thetotal on 118, Campbell (65) played indeterminately at Carl Hooper to be caughtat slip off the keeper’s gloves.McGarrell missed a hard return catch when Masakadza had 29, while CraigWishart, determined to be aggressive, escaped a possible stumping on 14.Masakadza’s only problems appeared to come when Colin Stuart reverse-swungthe ball in late to him from a full length. The West Indian bowling was notvery impressive, and Wishart hit Hooper for a huge six over the press box,only to survive a hard chance at silly point in the next over, fromMcGarrell.Masakadza ran to his fifty off 108 balls, looking more impressive all thetime. Wishart has perhaps never before given the appearance of suchconfidence at Test level, and a powerful if mistimed drive struck sillymid-off Daren Ganga a sickening blow by the eye, possibly ending hisparticipation in the match.A powerful pull for four by Wishart off Stuart brought up the batsman’sfirst Test fifty, in limited opportunities, since India’s visit three yearsago; it came off 91 balls. The century partnership came up and Zimbabwe took the lead with only two wickets down. Hooper’s leadership, so impressive when his team was on top, now began to appear rather limited.Wishart passed his previous Test best of 63 and caught Masakadza just beforetea, when both were on 81; without addition after tea, Wishart againbenefited from a botched stumping by Courtney Browne. The scoring slowed asboth batsmen approached centuries and West Indies took the second new ball.Wishart will forever rue his run-out for 93. He top-edged a ball almost tothe third man fielder and then appeared to stop in mid-pitch to expressrelief at his escape instead of completing his single; Browne lobbed theball to hit the bowler’s stumps as Wishart realised his aberration all toolate. The pair had added 170, the second-highest for Zimbabwe’s thirdwicket in Test cricket.Masakadza was then on 91, but he did not appear to let the dismissal affecthis concentration. He moved to 97 and played through a maiden fromMcGarrell, not without an unwise flirtation or two, before lashing Reon Kingthrough the covers for four to write his name into the history books.Shortly afterwards, perhaps battling physical and mental exhaustion, heoffered a simple catch to square leg that was dropped.Again Zimbabwe lost a wicket to the last ball of the day, this time withless doubt, as Guy Whittall was trapped lbw on the back foot by McGarrell’sarm ball for 14. Masakadza, on 115, lived to fight another day.
One of my earliest sports memories is watching John Elway and the Denver Broncos beat the Cleveland Browns to make it to the Super Bowl.
I then recall watching that Super Bowl at my cousin’s house and being very disappointed when the Broncos got spanked by that football team from Washington. I grew up loving football. I played football in junior high and high school. I devoted full weekends to watching hours and hours of football on television. Thankfully, those days are over.
Futbol, soccer, has supplanted football in my heart and on my TV. I first started to watch soccer around 2008 when I studied abroad in The Netherlands. The local pub I frequented is where I watched the games. I started following Tottenham a few years later and slowly soccer made more sense and became way more entertaining.
I started to see football as a less interesting and less entertaining alternative. Now it is rare that I sit down to watch a football game. I could talk about the problems with college athletics, or the incompetence in the NFL front-office, or safety issues with football as reasons why I have lost interest in the sport. These issues have certainly contributed to my indifference, but that is not the whole story.
A big part of the switch for me has been how much better the soccer fan experience is. Thus, here are three reasons why being a soccer fan is better than a being a football fan…
Soccer is a year-round sport
This has been a most pleasant and unexpected development in my soccer fandom. There is just so much soccer to watch. I follow the English Premier League (EPL) and Major League Soccer (MLS). The EPL season runs from August to May. Concurrently, there is Champions League and Europa League games during the week at various points in the season, as well as cup competitions.
The MLS season starts in March and ends in late October, so when EPL season ends, MLS is in full-gear over the summer months. And then there is international soccer. The World Cup happens every four years for both men and women, but they are staggered (men played last year, our women won it all this year).
In between cups, there are continental competitions, World Cup qualifying matches, and friendlies. So. Much. Soccer.
As for football, you got August through January. That’s it.
Commercial-free fandom
I realise that these days fans who record sporting events can fast forward through those pesky commercials. But most die-hards watch games live or at a sports bar, so sitting through commercials is a part of the experience. And if you watch a lot of football, you will spend most of that time watching commercials instead of actual game action.
Not so with soccer. A soccer game is two total hours of your time if there is a 15 minute pre or post game segment. Ninety minutes of that time is beautiful soccer action. There is no need to fast-forward through commercials because there aren’t any. There is a 15 minute half-time with at least half of it spent in the studio with the analysts breaking down the first 45. So you are left with about eight minutes of commercials during a soccer broadcast (not including those in any post/pre-game if there is such a segment).
The idea that many football fans have of soccer being so “boring” is silly when you consider that most of a football game is spent watching players and coaches stand around.
Not Just One Game In Town
If you like football, there are only two outlets for your fandom: the college and professional games. But in soccer, there are so many leagues that it is almost overwhelming and intimidating to get started as a fan. But this is a good thing, because choice is good. Especially when the options are of such quality.
The most watched league in the United States is the EPL. It is fast, physical and competitive. But there are other leagues with tremendous talent and arguably, better teams (though probably not as competitive as leagues). Germany has the Bundesliga, Spain La Liga, France Ligue 1, and so on and so forth.
And soccer coverage in America has gotten so good that you can now watch these leagues on one of numerous cable channels. For example, NBC Sports’s coverage of the EPL is fantastic and you can watch every single game online at no extra cost with your cable subscription login.
FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.
By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.
For football fans, you’re stuck with regional coverage and the only way you can watch out-of-market games is by forking over a lot of extra cash for the privilege.
I will admit that I sometimes get sucked into a big football game, or will check the scores to see how the Broncos and the Longhorns are doing. But I have no regrets about not spending anywhere from 3–9 hours on Saturdays and Sundays watching football.
EPL games start early and I am done by noon, which I am grateful for. This means I have the rest of the day to spend with the family or doing other things. I am grateful for that, too.
This article was submitted via our new Write For Us feature. Think you can do better? Submit your own article via the link below, and make sure you follow @FFC_WFU on Twitter for #RealOpinions…
Selhurst Park greeted two and a half thousand Cardiff City supporters including Lord Neil Kinnock, lifelong passionate Cardiff City supporter who had gone to his first match with his father and grandfather as a very young boy.
The former labour party leader’s grandson was the Bluebirds mascot for the match – there was a symmetry to that and to the whole day. This was new manager Malky Mackay and his team laying to rest the ghost of the former team by matching their achievements and reaching the championship play-offs.
The City fans, some of them in fancy dress, gathered in jovial spirit -every man woman and child believed that this time City were going to do it by their own hand.
The game kicked off and immediately City showed their intentions. Gunnarsson linking up with Lawrence down the left who floated a tricky cross into the box where Palace ‘keeper Lewis Price collected it confidently. A minute later he was in action again parrying away a powerfully struck, long range shot from Lawrence. The ball fell to Joe Mason tight on the near post but before he could tuck it away. Price had scrambled to his feet and palmed it behind for a City corner.
It was all Bluebirds until 13 minutes when a misunderstanding in midfield gave the ball to Darren Ambrose who slotted the ball cleverly through to Wilfried Zaha -the winger was clean through on goal, a moment of ‘Marshall madness’ ensued! He charged out to get the ball but Zaha keeping his composure tucked the ball neatly through Marshall with two back tracking defenders helpless to do anything other than to look on as it went into a gaping net. It was a rare mistake from the big Scottish ‘keeper, this season he has been the Bluebirds most improved player.
Groans from the City faithful were quickly changed to cheers. Today we were determined to cheer, come what may, we’d all vowed, players and supporters alike we weren’t going down lightly we were taking our shot at going up fighting!
City continued to dominate and Palace had little to offer, happy to knock the ball about at the back, City instigated attack after attack at the Palace defence. The final ball was lacking again but the spirit, passion and determination that had been missing from the side was now in evidence – it was surely only a matter of time before Cardiff were level?
I could see a young ‘Smurf’ high on his dads shoulders, he was shouting out instructions to the team and trying to rally and lead the supporters chants, clearly he had an unquestionable belief and as a man standing next to me said “Who are any of us to doubt a Smurf!” We were one nil down but there was an amazing carnival atmosphere, it was pouring with rain we were wet, cold and losing but we didn’t care.
The second half started the same way the first had ended – all Cardiff. Palace defending deeply, the Bluebirds harassing, hounding, confounding the Palace defensive line, Miller came close to scoring whistling an angled shot across a floundering Price’s goal. Then 52 minutes into the game, Mason going down the right side was brought down resulting in a yellow card and a free kick near the corner post to Cardiff. Whittingham stepped up to take it – what came next was sublime! Whittingham spotting Price was ill-prepared and poorly positioned, whipped the ball in with a wicked curling shot that passed everyone without taking any deflection straight into the far corner of the net. Everyone connected with Cardiff City be it on the pitch, in the dugout or in the stands -screamed and danced with exuberance.
Dougie Freedman who had history with Cardiff after making inflammatory comments on the eve of the Carling Cup Semi Final between the two teams saying that Cardiff fans were scared (a comment he later withdrew saying he had been misquoted), nevertheless wanted revenge for that Carling Cup defeat, made an immediate change taking off Sean Scannell for Antonio Pedroza.
It was to be in vain, on 61 minutes The Bluebirds took the lead. The constant pressure played off thanks to a long Aron Gunnersson throw-in, level with the corner flag, club captain Mark Hudson met it nodding it down and back to Don Cowie on the edge of the box. Cowie connected with the ball sweetly hitting it on the volley with near flawless technique and the ball flew through a mass of bodies into the bottom hand corner of the net. There was mass scream of “YES!” in the Bluebird end, quickly followed by dancing and hugging. The Smurf threw his hat into the air for it to never been seen again, a chant of Eddie Mays Barmy army went up – in my exuberance I hit notes Sir Tom Jones would have been proud of! It was at that point my voice went and I know I wasn’t alone.
Cardiff City were now playing excellent football, the style and quality we all know the team is capable of. Better still it was with passion, belief, heart, conviction and flair! All of which had been lacking during the run of depressing draws which had threatened to blight the season but was all in the past now and those draws depressing as they had seemed at the time had counted to get us into the play-off positions we were now comfortably sitting in, with the knowledge that the current Cardiff squad are big game players, ask Liverpool!
City were cruising, Palace were a one man team. Only goal scorer Zaha having anything that caused any concern and his surges down the wings were dealt with easily, Whittingham playing in his favoured forward left midfield position was immense, the dominant force in the centre. In the 89th minute Bluebird legend Robert Earnshaw came on to be part of the play off party – it seemed right and fitting that when the final whistle blew a link with past glories (Earnshaw was part of the squad that had been promoted into the championship) was on the pitch.
I said at the beginning it was a day for symmetry, of full circles – Malky Makay has led a squad he had to build practically from scratch from slim pickings, thanks to a tight budget and an unyielding loan market, and he has not only matched the achievements of former Bluebird manager Dave Jones reaching the playoffs, he has trumped them with the Carling Cup Final appearance, an appearance which provided a day of magic and excitement that along with the 2008 FA Cup appearance will live in the hearts and minds of all Cardiff City supporters for the rest of their days.
The final results filtered through to us and confirmed it’s Thursday night May the 3rd and West Ham at Cardiff City Stadium, then on to Upton Park on Bank Holiday Monday the 7th of May for the return leg.
FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.
By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Cardiff City go into those play-off games with no pressure, all expectations exceeded, it’s the first time in recent seasons that’s been the case and they also have the knowledge they are the equals of anyone, West ham be afraid be very afraid!
The play off final it’s self is On May 19th Eddie May’s birthday, seems meant, written in the stars it’s our year.